Example: When Obama states "At the time I took office, we had a one year deficit of over $1 trillion and projected deficits of $8 trillion over the next decade" even though it is true the Obama haters see is he is blaming Bush.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?Yes. We are all supposed to forget and never mention at any time the disaster that awaited President Obama on his first day in office or else that is considered blaming Bush, which for some reason is supposed to be taboo.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?
Wasn't a true statement to begin with. The problem with Obama is he has done nothing to stop the bleeding. The other problem, Bush inherited the housing bubble, which burst under his watch. Although he many times went to Congress and said that the sub par loans were going to cause a recession and a collapse of the banking industry, Barney Frank and Chris Dodd denied there were any problems and refused to change the practice of sub par loans that the banks were forced to make.
The truth is Obama has no idea what he is doing, has no real plans to fix the economy, what plans he does have are to little to late and most will only exacerbated the problems.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?Of course; otherwise they'd have to admit they were wrong in voting twice for an imbecile who did his very best to destroy everything good and right about this nation, and who irresponsibly left us in a financial hole to the tune of billions of dollars. Sometimes, late at night in my most paranoid moments, I think that Bush %26amp; co. spent the last year in office figuring out how to screw things up so they could then b**ch at progressives that things aren't improving fast enough. You know, like they're doing right now.
Obama did not inherit a trillion dollar deficit. He did inherit a $450+ billion deficit which was a US history record but Obama's 1st year was a $1.3 trillion dollar deficit. Bush wasn't great and many bad things happened during his presidency (dot-com burst, 9-11, 2 wars, rest estate bust, recession) and he also passed spending measures that were irresponsible but so far Obama's level if spending has been staggering. The Tarp funds that bush allowed put out were loans that a majority of which was paid back. This money was then turned into a slush fund when Obama took office and when the loans were paid back Obama proposed to spend it as if it were free money coming in and not the borrowed money loaned to stabilize the markets and be put back when returned.
Yes the pundits go to far some times and nit pick but history is also distorted to have people believe certain things by telling and leaving out certain details. Bush inherited a surplus, but that was built on Republicans pact with americans, welfare reform, and mostly the explxion of growth from the technology industry which collapsed and the government lost much revenue when this happened.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?Not only are we not supposed to blame Bush, we're not even supposed to REMEMBER that he was ever our President!
He disappeared in a puff of smoke last February and all Obama has to do to make his huge Recession and National Debt is click his heels three times - don't you know that?Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?
the economy was growing under bush and then died in 2008.
What you forget to mention is that both Clinton and Bush, republicans and democrats are to blame for the recession.
Obama just fails to fix it, like Carter from 1977-1981.
Yes.
GDP growth is a POSITIVE 2.2%, after falling to NEGATIVE 6.3% under Bush.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?
Yes. Most Obama haters already attribute the 2009 budget and deficit to Obama. Even though he wasn't President when the budget for made.
Of course. When Obama mentions facts that are too blatant for even the craftiest conservatives to deny, it must mean he's blaming Bush.
Yes, very safe.
In this polarized political environment either side would do this
Didn't use to be this way... I hate them all
If it weren't true, it wouldn't be blaming. It would be lying.
No, but isn't time he stops whining and explain his bigger spending.
NO THEIR HARD HEAD, LET THEM HATE, I LOVE IT, FOUR MORE YEARS OF OBAMA PEOPLE
here here, how is it blaming if he is stating CONCRETE fact
You, Your Party and Your President are GOING DOWN!!!
No, but it is safe to say defenders of Obama have no concept of how it got there. Explaining it over and over though, is like trying to teach a pig to sing. You are annoying the pig and wasting your time.
Maybe it would be different if he didn't do it EVERY time he speaks or Nancy or Harry or 0bama's mouthpiece. It's getting very old. Besides that , look at the defit NOW!
No comments:
Post a Comment