Is this the first time that Obama forgot that he was a representative of the people?How many other important issues has Obama missed while on the campaign trail?To be honest with you Obama answers present the majority of the time. Also his 143 days in office are equivalent to a first graders experience. He may be an excellent Speaker but that is all, He can not and will not cut taxes, it is impossible given the debt and his tax plan percentage wise helps the richest.
NO TO OBAMA at least this electionHow many other important issues has Obama missed while on the campaign trail?
None - unlike McShame he has shown that he can focus on more than one issue at a time.
A quality we need in a president.
McShame should be ashamed at trying to politicize this.
Not much of an *** kicker are you boy?How many other important issues has Obama missed while on the campaign trail?I don't know. He missed 45.9% of his votes so far.
But honestly, I think you might want to direct your question to John McCain who has missed 64.1%.
How many other important issues has Obama missed while on the campaign trail?
I'm certain Senator Obama has 'missed' only a few important issues since being on the campaign trail -- just as many as Senator McCain. I'm sure you'll find that they've BOTH missed a few votes recently.
Obama, I'm certain has not forgotten that he IS a representative of the people -- he knows people put him where he is. I think that is precisely why he has handled this the way he has. I'd much rather see a debate than footage of both men going to....work. I'd like to see them in such a setting together. As I mentioned in my answer to another of your questions, this is PURE POLITICS! Obama is representing the supporters of his who want to see the debate. McCain is representing his supporters who consider it beneficial for him to go to Washington.
They are BOTH representatives of the people. The people they've chosen to please just happen to want different things.
As a matter of fact, check this out!
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congr鈥?/a>How many other important issues has Obama missed while on the campaign trail?All his previous positions--state senator, lawyer, community organizer bored him. I'm not at all surprised to learn how bored he was as a U.
S. Senator.
Saturday, February 18, 2012
Obama says he will cut the federal deficit in half his first term by raising taxes on the wealthy and business?
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't most of the libs who funded Mr. Obama quite wealthy? And how does changing welfare guidelines and increasing business tax "stimulate jobs" thus stimulating the economy long-term, if at all? Is this guy serious?Obama says he will cut the federal deficit in half his first term by raising taxes on the wealthy and business?The rich will never pay more than they themselves are willing to pay.
They'll just pass the increase on down to us and we the working class/consumers will pay the difference.
This will not stimulate the economy in fact it will cripple it even more than it already is because the less money we have the less money the rich have and if the rich cannot force us to pay their overhead then they will go out of business and the people they employ will be out of jobs.
Or the rich will just take their businesses and company's overseas where they can operate for a mere fraction of what they pay here for overhead including taxes.
So start saying "Bye,bye" to big businesses across America because as soon as Uncle Sam attempts to dig deeper into their pockets they'll run for the hills never to be seen or heard from again.
And in the meantime we will become a Socialist Country and live our lives relying on the Gov. for our every need which if history has anything for us to learn from then we know that the Gov. doesn't take care of anyone it only takes care of itself.
Just look at China and North Korea and see how well they take care of their people and this should give you a pretty good idea of what's in store for us.Obama says he will cut the federal deficit in half his first term by raising taxes on the wealthy and business?
I feel like he should not bring us out of debt by spending more money, but should be putting more effort into creating more jobs.Obama says he will cut the federal deficit in half his first term by raising taxes on the wealthy and business?This is what you get when you elect someone with absolutely zero experience in the executive branch of government, much less any experience operating anything. Maybe if he had run a lemonade stand when he was a kid, but he doesn't even have that much of a background.
this guy will go down as the worst president in history.and he had some pretty stiff competition until this.Obama says he will cut the federal deficit in half his first term by raising taxes on the wealthy and business?It just dosent add up. He spends 800 billion %26amp; cuts 95% of peoples taxes but hes going to get enough out of the other 5% to get rid of half the deficit? BS.Obama says he will cut the federal deficit in half his first term by raising taxes on the wealthy and business?
FIRST TERM? This guy will only have one term!
the only thing tax increases do is hurt the economy. The "rich" are also employers and are the ones that spend money. Barry should read some history and talk to economists! THIS GUY IS CLUELESS!
This spending bill is dangerous and won't help this country!
what I find strange is the term (first term) as it is a preconceived notion that there will be a second boy ,hows that for humility?Obama says he will cut the federal deficit in half his first term by raising taxes on the wealthy and business?
I wouldn't worry too much about this. He's lying. He cannot tax businesses more in a recession. The main reason is increasing the tax on them will not bring more revenue when their profits are down. It will also lead to more lay offs. I'd be worried about this guy if I thought he'd follow through with anything he says.
Over taxing businesses is what drove many of them out of this country. How he plans to have any sort of economy without business is beyond me. If this happens then I would not doubt that some of the states that are considering declaring sovereignty would do it.
He may as well run the rest of them to Red China
Adding to your keen observations, as we've seen from his cabinet picks, they tend to avoid paying their taxes as well. Is it any surprise that this unqualified, untested Bozo is learning his job OJT? The problem is Americans will pay for his boatload of mistakes. Maybe next election Americans will examine their candidate a little more closely and not simply believe his fancy-schmancy speeches that are as transparent as his resume.
Only a moron would think a bankrupt country is capable of bailing out bankrupt corporations. Fiscal idiocy at its finest!
Obama is both dead serious and dead wrong.
The only way I see him doing this is if he can plug up the loop holes that the rich use to pay little or no tax.
and his definition of wealthy has been changing 250,000. 200,000. 175,000. if the definition hasn't gotten down to 40,000. it will soon...
always nosnod
B. HUSSEIN OBAMA SAY THAT HE IS GOING TO RAISE TAXES ONLY ON THE RICH IS A JOKE. WHEN THE BUSH TAX CUTS ARE ALLOWED TO EXPIRE IN 2010 IT WILL RAISE TAXES ON ALL SINCE EVERYBODY GOT TAX CUTS. OF COURSE THE WEALTHY GOT MORE IN CUTS SINCE THEY MAKE MORE THUS HAVING A LARGER RATE REDUCED. IT'S BASIC MATH EXCEPT TO THOSE THAT ADVOCATE CLASS WARFARE.
Talk is usually cheap, but his kind of talk will cost us all a fortune in future taxes. Obama knows he will not be held accountable for anything he says, so he says anything he wants.
LOL. So those of us that depend on the Rich to provide us jobs will be SOL... He must have his head up his A S S.... I never got a job from a poor person.
He is a liar. Even if the wealthy gave up all of their income in taxes, we would still have a huge amount of debt. He is just saying things that sound good to get approval. He actually intends to take as much as he can from us, not from them. But, don't forget, he is a socialist, so he will talk about taking from the rich and giving to the poor. Notice how well that has worked in other socialist/communist countries, such as Russia and China?
Raising taxes cuts government revenues and the wealthy are the ones who make jobs so i dont see how this can happen with the Obama plan
And he should. They rich have never paid their fair share of taxes. Its about time.
As one of those "wealthy libs" you're talking about, I have no problem helping to pay down the deficit.
This is my country and I love it.
next...
You don't know the first thing about spreading the wealth around. Why would you be surprised? I said many times that is what he wanted to do (ex. Joe "The Plumber"). He had to do this to create change and hope, or else nothing's going to happen. We can't continue down the path of a failed administration.traffic school forza motorsport 3
They'll just pass the increase on down to us and we the working class/consumers will pay the difference.
This will not stimulate the economy in fact it will cripple it even more than it already is because the less money we have the less money the rich have and if the rich cannot force us to pay their overhead then they will go out of business and the people they employ will be out of jobs.
Or the rich will just take their businesses and company's overseas where they can operate for a mere fraction of what they pay here for overhead including taxes.
So start saying "Bye,bye" to big businesses across America because as soon as Uncle Sam attempts to dig deeper into their pockets they'll run for the hills never to be seen or heard from again.
And in the meantime we will become a Socialist Country and live our lives relying on the Gov. for our every need which if history has anything for us to learn from then we know that the Gov. doesn't take care of anyone it only takes care of itself.
Just look at China and North Korea and see how well they take care of their people and this should give you a pretty good idea of what's in store for us.Obama says he will cut the federal deficit in half his first term by raising taxes on the wealthy and business?
I feel like he should not bring us out of debt by spending more money, but should be putting more effort into creating more jobs.Obama says he will cut the federal deficit in half his first term by raising taxes on the wealthy and business?This is what you get when you elect someone with absolutely zero experience in the executive branch of government, much less any experience operating anything. Maybe if he had run a lemonade stand when he was a kid, but he doesn't even have that much of a background.
this guy will go down as the worst president in history.and he had some pretty stiff competition until this.Obama says he will cut the federal deficit in half his first term by raising taxes on the wealthy and business?It just dosent add up. He spends 800 billion %26amp; cuts 95% of peoples taxes but hes going to get enough out of the other 5% to get rid of half the deficit? BS.Obama says he will cut the federal deficit in half his first term by raising taxes on the wealthy and business?
FIRST TERM? This guy will only have one term!
the only thing tax increases do is hurt the economy. The "rich" are also employers and are the ones that spend money. Barry should read some history and talk to economists! THIS GUY IS CLUELESS!
This spending bill is dangerous and won't help this country!
what I find strange is the term (first term) as it is a preconceived notion that there will be a second boy ,hows that for humility?Obama says he will cut the federal deficit in half his first term by raising taxes on the wealthy and business?
I wouldn't worry too much about this. He's lying. He cannot tax businesses more in a recession. The main reason is increasing the tax on them will not bring more revenue when their profits are down. It will also lead to more lay offs. I'd be worried about this guy if I thought he'd follow through with anything he says.
Over taxing businesses is what drove many of them out of this country. How he plans to have any sort of economy without business is beyond me. If this happens then I would not doubt that some of the states that are considering declaring sovereignty would do it.
He may as well run the rest of them to Red China
Adding to your keen observations, as we've seen from his cabinet picks, they tend to avoid paying their taxes as well. Is it any surprise that this unqualified, untested Bozo is learning his job OJT? The problem is Americans will pay for his boatload of mistakes. Maybe next election Americans will examine their candidate a little more closely and not simply believe his fancy-schmancy speeches that are as transparent as his resume.
Only a moron would think a bankrupt country is capable of bailing out bankrupt corporations. Fiscal idiocy at its finest!
Obama is both dead serious and dead wrong.
The only way I see him doing this is if he can plug up the loop holes that the rich use to pay little or no tax.
and his definition of wealthy has been changing 250,000. 200,000. 175,000. if the definition hasn't gotten down to 40,000. it will soon...
always nosnod
B. HUSSEIN OBAMA SAY THAT HE IS GOING TO RAISE TAXES ONLY ON THE RICH IS A JOKE. WHEN THE BUSH TAX CUTS ARE ALLOWED TO EXPIRE IN 2010 IT WILL RAISE TAXES ON ALL SINCE EVERYBODY GOT TAX CUTS. OF COURSE THE WEALTHY GOT MORE IN CUTS SINCE THEY MAKE MORE THUS HAVING A LARGER RATE REDUCED. IT'S BASIC MATH EXCEPT TO THOSE THAT ADVOCATE CLASS WARFARE.
Talk is usually cheap, but his kind of talk will cost us all a fortune in future taxes. Obama knows he will not be held accountable for anything he says, so he says anything he wants.
LOL. So those of us that depend on the Rich to provide us jobs will be SOL... He must have his head up his A S S.... I never got a job from a poor person.
He is a liar. Even if the wealthy gave up all of their income in taxes, we would still have a huge amount of debt. He is just saying things that sound good to get approval. He actually intends to take as much as he can from us, not from them. But, don't forget, he is a socialist, so he will talk about taking from the rich and giving to the poor. Notice how well that has worked in other socialist/communist countries, such as Russia and China?
Raising taxes cuts government revenues and the wealthy are the ones who make jobs so i dont see how this can happen with the Obama plan
And he should. They rich have never paid their fair share of taxes. Its about time.
As one of those "wealthy libs" you're talking about, I have no problem helping to pay down the deficit.
This is my country and I love it.
next...
You don't know the first thing about spreading the wealth around. Why would you be surprised? I said many times that is what he wanted to do (ex. Joe "The Plumber"). He had to do this to create change and hope, or else nothing's going to happen. We can't continue down the path of a failed administration.
How far to the left should Obama go in choosing a successor for John Paul Stevens?
How far to the left should Obama go in choosing a successor for John Paul Stevens?How far to the left should Obama go in choosing a successor for John Paul Stevens?He doesn't need to go 'far Left' at all to find a solid replacementHow far to the left should Obama go in choosing a successor for John Paul Stevens?
how about instead of going left he found someone well qualified, well educated, and is dedicated to fallowing the rules of law and the Constitution to the tee.How far to the left should Obama go in choosing a successor for John Paul Stevens?To get any farther left than that senile liberal moron, he'll have to pick someone from a parallel universe.How far to the left should Obama go in choosing a successor for John Paul Stevens?
As far left as they can get away with.How far to the left should Obama go in choosing a successor for John Paul Stevens?He should pick a left wing anarchist. That would be entertaining.
how about instead of going left he found someone well qualified, well educated, and is dedicated to fallowing the rules of law and the Constitution to the tee.How far to the left should Obama go in choosing a successor for John Paul Stevens?To get any farther left than that senile liberal moron, he'll have to pick someone from a parallel universe.How far to the left should Obama go in choosing a successor for John Paul Stevens?
As far left as they can get away with.How far to the left should Obama go in choosing a successor for John Paul Stevens?He should pick a left wing anarchist. That would be entertaining.
Extremely right wing terrorists are planning the assassination of Obama?
This report is on several new stations. Extremely right wing terrorist are planning to kill Obama.They quot they will kill blacks in schools and kill Obama die trying. Where can I find more about this terrorist group?Extremely right wing terrorists are planning the assassination of Obama?These guys are wacko criminals.....please don't give them attention.
This is an awful display of hate.Extremely right wing terrorists are planning the assassination of Obama?
A few "skinheads", don't go over board please. No one has all the details and I am not minimizing anything, but don't make a bigger deal of this than is necessary. At least wait for all the facts. People like you are as frightening as they are. ThanksExtremely right wing terrorists are planning the assassination of Obama?These are the skinheads. There are many subgroups, but they've been around in one form or another for a long time.
And their plot was very, very far-fetched, and it didn't get anywhere.
They are skinheads, a well known group with plenty of information on WWW.
Also, they captured the bastards and will charged accordingly.Extremely right wing terrorists are planning the assassination of Obama?You can start your own charter group.
They are mostly run independently.Extremely right wing terrorists are planning the assassination of Obama?
The FBI broke it up. In reality, it was just a couple of rednecks from Tennessee and Arkansas with a plan drawn up one night while drinking Wild Turkey and watching NASCAR.
go to the obama web site. we have several plans to leak such information and claim voter fraud if the election is close
obama08Extremely right wing terrorists are planning the assassination of Obama?
I honestly hope you are wrong and if there is anyone so dumb as to try to kill a presidential or vice presidential candidate from ANY party that they are quickly round up.
Newsflash "Extremely left wing liberals are planning to kill the USA."
If they're muslim's they'll be assassinating one of their own.
no your confused there looking for osama.
It was 2 idiots. If you want hate, read Michelle Obama's thesis on white people.
Please do not spread this kind of rhetoric. We need to support the President of our nation...period.
If I turn up the brightness and contrast on my t.v. he looks white!
Call 1800KKK
Yes, they're called the Republican National Committee (RNC)%26gt;
They sure are, big surprise there.
This is an awful display of hate.Extremely right wing terrorists are planning the assassination of Obama?
A few "skinheads", don't go over board please. No one has all the details and I am not minimizing anything, but don't make a bigger deal of this than is necessary. At least wait for all the facts. People like you are as frightening as they are. ThanksExtremely right wing terrorists are planning the assassination of Obama?These are the skinheads. There are many subgroups, but they've been around in one form or another for a long time.
And their plot was very, very far-fetched, and it didn't get anywhere.
They are skinheads, a well known group with plenty of information on WWW.
Also, they captured the bastards and will charged accordingly.Extremely right wing terrorists are planning the assassination of Obama?You can start your own charter group.
They are mostly run independently.Extremely right wing terrorists are planning the assassination of Obama?
The FBI broke it up. In reality, it was just a couple of rednecks from Tennessee and Arkansas with a plan drawn up one night while drinking Wild Turkey and watching NASCAR.
go to the obama web site. we have several plans to leak such information and claim voter fraud if the election is close
obama08Extremely right wing terrorists are planning the assassination of Obama?
I honestly hope you are wrong and if there is anyone so dumb as to try to kill a presidential or vice presidential candidate from ANY party that they are quickly round up.
Newsflash "Extremely left wing liberals are planning to kill the USA."
If they're muslim's they'll be assassinating one of their own.
no your confused there looking for osama.
It was 2 idiots. If you want hate, read Michelle Obama's thesis on white people.
Please do not spread this kind of rhetoric. We need to support the President of our nation...period.
If I turn up the brightness and contrast on my t.v. he looks white!
Call 1800KKK
Yes, they're called the Republican National Committee (RNC)%26gt;
They sure are, big surprise there.
Do You think Obama is taking lessons from Carter on how to be a useless president?
Obama is fiddling with the march madness pics as the world goes to h---. Instead of taking positive action to help the rebels in Libya or show aggressive action against our adversaries He does nothing. We have not seen that much inaction since Carter walked around the white house wondering what to do about the Iranian hostages. Obama has chosen not to even mention the americans being held in Iran.Do You think Obama is taking lessons from Carter on how to be a useless president?Obama has long since taken the title of "worse President of all time" away from Carter. He really is useless. And now that he is campaigning for a second term, he will do nothing at all which might lose votes. We have been taught that community organizers are not leaders.
Remove him in 2012 and send him back to the Chicago machine where he belongs.Do You think Obama is taking lessons from Carter on how to be a useless president?
Obama would have been more useful and succesful playing the President on West Wing. As the POTUS he's beyond useless. He's an embarassment.Do You think Obama is taking lessons from Carter on how to be a useless president?He is undecided and so he just does nothing.. He just keeps on talking until the issue has passed and then that passes for a decision.
He does not have experience to back him up so appears undecided which he is..l
PDo You think Obama is taking lessons from Carter on how to be a useless president?
I heard that President Obama is enrolled in night classes at the James Buchanan School of Government.Do You think Obama is taking lessons from Carter on how to be a useless president?At least Carter had the good sense to stay in the rose garden, and not run off on many vacations like Obama.Do You think Obama is taking lessons from Carter on how to be a useless president?
He does not need lessons. He could teach James Carter much about being useless as a president.
There are so many issues, so little time. Hang in there, its frustrating but I think he will prevail.
Remove him in 2012 and send him back to the Chicago machine where he belongs.Do You think Obama is taking lessons from Carter on how to be a useless president?
Obama would have been more useful and succesful playing the President on West Wing. As the POTUS he's beyond useless. He's an embarassment.Do You think Obama is taking lessons from Carter on how to be a useless president?He is undecided and so he just does nothing.. He just keeps on talking until the issue has passed and then that passes for a decision.
He does not have experience to back him up so appears undecided which he is..l
PDo You think Obama is taking lessons from Carter on how to be a useless president?
I heard that President Obama is enrolled in night classes at the James Buchanan School of Government.Do You think Obama is taking lessons from Carter on how to be a useless president?At least Carter had the good sense to stay in the rose garden, and not run off on many vacations like Obama.Do You think Obama is taking lessons from Carter on how to be a useless president?
He does not need lessons. He could teach James Carter much about being useless as a president.
There are so many issues, so little time. Hang in there, its frustrating but I think he will prevail.
What would be the difference between Obama and Republicans if conservatives don`t block the debt ceiling?
If Republicans do not block the debt ceiling why not vote for Obama again? There would be no difference.What would be the difference between Obama and Republicans if conservatives don`t block the debt ceiling?If Republicans do block the debt ceiling increase, it won't matter, because we'll all be answering to the Chinese Premier.What would be the difference between Obama and Republicans if conservatives don`t block the debt ceiling?
Really? lol, do you live under a rock? I agree we need to stop the deficit spending NOW, but the same? Is something wrong with being real?
Don't tell me ... Ron Paul right? He's a liar and he gets his followers talking nonsense and hating on those he see's as a threat. Ron Paul is a Progressive tude in Conservative Clothing. I quit the Democratic party because of those kinds of behaviors.
So republicans wanted to pull an unconstitutional health care take over? They tell business where they can go? They steal money from rightful holders and give it to their cronies?
I agree though, Republicans that support big government are slow death of this country and all it's been that made it great, while Democrats are on the fast track.
There are so many things they need to block and I'd hope they would stand hard and destroy what damage Obama has done. They need to defund all unconstitutional federal government departments like education, and many others.
We need politicians who are using government to build their power OUT NOWWhat would be the difference between Obama and Republicans if conservatives don`t block the debt ceiling?They are just playing politics, and getting nothing done.
Democrats opposed the debt ceiling when Bush was President.
Now Republicans are.
We have real problems in this country, and all each worry about is their own party and retaining their individual power. It's disgusting.
It ultimately depends on what else is tied to it. Obama wants it raised with absolutely no new limits on spending, whereas, sane people want at least some promises to clean up the spending mess we're in.What would be the difference between Obama and Republicans if conservatives don`t block the debt ceiling?Virtually none. But the house voted 300 something to 90 something to not raise the debt ceiling. And believe it or not Nancy Pelosi voted with Republicans.What would be the difference between Obama and Republicans if conservatives don`t block the debt ceiling?
The Republicans voted 7 times to raise the debt ceiling under bush!...that was 7 times!!...and that was when we didnt have to according to Wallstreet?...why dont you repubs have any shame whatsoever?
GOP blocked it already.
THANK GOD!What would be the difference between Obama and Republicans if conservatives don`t block the debt ceiling?
The key to this is to cut spending. I don't understand what part of this Libs fail to comprehend.
Really? lol, do you live under a rock? I agree we need to stop the deficit spending NOW, but the same? Is something wrong with being real?
Don't tell me ... Ron Paul right? He's a liar and he gets his followers talking nonsense and hating on those he see's as a threat. Ron Paul is a Progressive tude in Conservative Clothing. I quit the Democratic party because of those kinds of behaviors.
So republicans wanted to pull an unconstitutional health care take over? They tell business where they can go? They steal money from rightful holders and give it to their cronies?
I agree though, Republicans that support big government are slow death of this country and all it's been that made it great, while Democrats are on the fast track.
There are so many things they need to block and I'd hope they would stand hard and destroy what damage Obama has done. They need to defund all unconstitutional federal government departments like education, and many others.
We need politicians who are using government to build their power OUT NOWWhat would be the difference between Obama and Republicans if conservatives don`t block the debt ceiling?They are just playing politics, and getting nothing done.
Democrats opposed the debt ceiling when Bush was President.
Now Republicans are.
We have real problems in this country, and all each worry about is their own party and retaining their individual power. It's disgusting.
It ultimately depends on what else is tied to it. Obama wants it raised with absolutely no new limits on spending, whereas, sane people want at least some promises to clean up the spending mess we're in.What would be the difference between Obama and Republicans if conservatives don`t block the debt ceiling?Virtually none. But the house voted 300 something to 90 something to not raise the debt ceiling. And believe it or not Nancy Pelosi voted with Republicans.What would be the difference between Obama and Republicans if conservatives don`t block the debt ceiling?
The Republicans voted 7 times to raise the debt ceiling under bush!...that was 7 times!!...and that was when we didnt have to according to Wallstreet?...why dont you repubs have any shame whatsoever?
GOP blocked it already.
THANK GOD!What would be the difference between Obama and Republicans if conservatives don`t block the debt ceiling?
The key to this is to cut spending. I don't understand what part of this Libs fail to comprehend.
Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?
George Bush?
Example: When Obama states "At the time I took office, we had a one year deficit of over $1 trillion and projected deficits of $8 trillion over the next decade" even though it is true the Obama haters see is he is blaming Bush.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?Yes. We are all supposed to forget and never mention at any time the disaster that awaited President Obama on his first day in office or else that is considered blaming Bush, which for some reason is supposed to be taboo.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?
Wasn't a true statement to begin with. The problem with Obama is he has done nothing to stop the bleeding. The other problem, Bush inherited the housing bubble, which burst under his watch. Although he many times went to Congress and said that the sub par loans were going to cause a recession and a collapse of the banking industry, Barney Frank and Chris Dodd denied there were any problems and refused to change the practice of sub par loans that the banks were forced to make.
The truth is Obama has no idea what he is doing, has no real plans to fix the economy, what plans he does have are to little to late and most will only exacerbated the problems.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?Of course; otherwise they'd have to admit they were wrong in voting twice for an imbecile who did his very best to destroy everything good and right about this nation, and who irresponsibly left us in a financial hole to the tune of billions of dollars. Sometimes, late at night in my most paranoid moments, I think that Bush %26amp; co. spent the last year in office figuring out how to screw things up so they could then b**ch at progressives that things aren't improving fast enough. You know, like they're doing right now.
Obama did not inherit a trillion dollar deficit. He did inherit a $450+ billion deficit which was a US history record but Obama's 1st year was a $1.3 trillion dollar deficit. Bush wasn't great and many bad things happened during his presidency (dot-com burst, 9-11, 2 wars, rest estate bust, recession) and he also passed spending measures that were irresponsible but so far Obama's level if spending has been staggering. The Tarp funds that bush allowed put out were loans that a majority of which was paid back. This money was then turned into a slush fund when Obama took office and when the loans were paid back Obama proposed to spend it as if it were free money coming in and not the borrowed money loaned to stabilize the markets and be put back when returned.
Yes the pundits go to far some times and nit pick but history is also distorted to have people believe certain things by telling and leaving out certain details. Bush inherited a surplus, but that was built on Republicans pact with americans, welfare reform, and mostly the explxion of growth from the technology industry which collapsed and the government lost much revenue when this happened.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?Not only are we not supposed to blame Bush, we're not even supposed to REMEMBER that he was ever our President!
He disappeared in a puff of smoke last February and all Obama has to do to make his huge Recession and National Debt is click his heels three times - don't you know that?Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?
the economy was growing under bush and then died in 2008.
What you forget to mention is that both Clinton and Bush, republicans and democrats are to blame for the recession.
Obama just fails to fix it, like Carter from 1977-1981.
Yes.
GDP growth is a POSITIVE 2.2%, after falling to NEGATIVE 6.3% under Bush.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?
Yes. Most Obama haters already attribute the 2009 budget and deficit to Obama. Even though he wasn't President when the budget for made.
Of course. When Obama mentions facts that are too blatant for even the craftiest conservatives to deny, it must mean he's blaming Bush.
Yes, very safe.
In this polarized political environment either side would do this
Didn't use to be this way... I hate them all
If it weren't true, it wouldn't be blaming. It would be lying.
No, but isn't time he stops whining and explain his bigger spending.
NO THEIR HARD HEAD, LET THEM HATE, I LOVE IT, FOUR MORE YEARS OF OBAMA PEOPLE
here here, how is it blaming if he is stating CONCRETE fact
You, Your Party and Your President are GOING DOWN!!!
No, but it is safe to say defenders of Obama have no concept of how it got there. Explaining it over and over though, is like trying to teach a pig to sing. You are annoying the pig and wasting your time.
Maybe it would be different if he didn't do it EVERY time he speaks or Nancy or Harry or 0bama's mouthpiece. It's getting very old. Besides that , look at the defit NOW!california academy of sciences black ops zombie maps
Example: When Obama states "At the time I took office, we had a one year deficit of over $1 trillion and projected deficits of $8 trillion over the next decade" even though it is true the Obama haters see is he is blaming Bush.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?Yes. We are all supposed to forget and never mention at any time the disaster that awaited President Obama on his first day in office or else that is considered blaming Bush, which for some reason is supposed to be taboo.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?
Wasn't a true statement to begin with. The problem with Obama is he has done nothing to stop the bleeding. The other problem, Bush inherited the housing bubble, which burst under his watch. Although he many times went to Congress and said that the sub par loans were going to cause a recession and a collapse of the banking industry, Barney Frank and Chris Dodd denied there were any problems and refused to change the practice of sub par loans that the banks were forced to make.
The truth is Obama has no idea what he is doing, has no real plans to fix the economy, what plans he does have are to little to late and most will only exacerbated the problems.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?Of course; otherwise they'd have to admit they were wrong in voting twice for an imbecile who did his very best to destroy everything good and right about this nation, and who irresponsibly left us in a financial hole to the tune of billions of dollars. Sometimes, late at night in my most paranoid moments, I think that Bush %26amp; co. spent the last year in office figuring out how to screw things up so they could then b**ch at progressives that things aren't improving fast enough. You know, like they're doing right now.
Obama did not inherit a trillion dollar deficit. He did inherit a $450+ billion deficit which was a US history record but Obama's 1st year was a $1.3 trillion dollar deficit. Bush wasn't great and many bad things happened during his presidency (dot-com burst, 9-11, 2 wars, rest estate bust, recession) and he also passed spending measures that were irresponsible but so far Obama's level if spending has been staggering. The Tarp funds that bush allowed put out were loans that a majority of which was paid back. This money was then turned into a slush fund when Obama took office and when the loans were paid back Obama proposed to spend it as if it were free money coming in and not the borrowed money loaned to stabilize the markets and be put back when returned.
Yes the pundits go to far some times and nit pick but history is also distorted to have people believe certain things by telling and leaving out certain details. Bush inherited a surplus, but that was built on Republicans pact with americans, welfare reform, and mostly the explxion of growth from the technology industry which collapsed and the government lost much revenue when this happened.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?Not only are we not supposed to blame Bush, we're not even supposed to REMEMBER that he was ever our President!
He disappeared in a puff of smoke last February and all Obama has to do to make his huge Recession and National Debt is click his heels three times - don't you know that?Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?
the economy was growing under bush and then died in 2008.
What you forget to mention is that both Clinton and Bush, republicans and democrats are to blame for the recession.
Obama just fails to fix it, like Carter from 1977-1981.
Yes.
GDP growth is a POSITIVE 2.2%, after falling to NEGATIVE 6.3% under Bush.Is it safe to say Obama haters consider any reference to conditions at the time Obama took office as blaming?
Yes. Most Obama haters already attribute the 2009 budget and deficit to Obama. Even though he wasn't President when the budget for made.
Of course. When Obama mentions facts that are too blatant for even the craftiest conservatives to deny, it must mean he's blaming Bush.
Yes, very safe.
In this polarized political environment either side would do this
Didn't use to be this way... I hate them all
If it weren't true, it wouldn't be blaming. It would be lying.
No, but isn't time he stops whining and explain his bigger spending.
NO THEIR HARD HEAD, LET THEM HATE, I LOVE IT, FOUR MORE YEARS OF OBAMA PEOPLE
here here, how is it blaming if he is stating CONCRETE fact
You, Your Party and Your President are GOING DOWN!!!
No, but it is safe to say defenders of Obama have no concept of how it got there. Explaining it over and over though, is like trying to teach a pig to sing. You are annoying the pig and wasting your time.
Maybe it would be different if he didn't do it EVERY time he speaks or Nancy or Harry or 0bama's mouthpiece. It's getting very old. Besides that , look at the defit NOW!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)